As the adage goes, vote early, vote often, so we snuck the little one into the booth and cast an extra ballot. Ok, so not really, but the kid, being a DCite, got into the game early.
Our time back here coincided with the presidential primary, so we went out and voted. Our guy (or should I say, "gal") didn't win, so that was a bummer. I'm still a supporter till the race is called.
A simple response to Preya is that I do not agree that voting for
Hillary now is bad for the party. But on a wider view, I don't understand the hoopla and lack of analysis that we get from political reporters during this election cycle. Yeah, Obama has won more states, but there are few who ask "do those states matter?"
For instance, Obama (re)started his momentum with a win in South Carolina, taking a 26 to 14 delegate tally. But when was the last time the Democratic nominee won South Carolina in the general election? You have to go back to
1976 when Carter took this neighbor to Georgia over Ford.
Can we reasonably expect any Democratic nominee to turn this demographic tide?
Of course, similarly, Hillary won Arizona and took a 35-27 advantage. But will that mean anything in the general against McCain? That delegate victory should be discounted when we are sizing up who would be the best candidate in the general election. After all, as Al Gore showed, it's not about winning the popular vote, but rather, squeeking out wins in places that matter.
"States that matter" are the 19 states which were blue in the 2004 Presidential Election. After all, when viewing things thru the lens of trying to win the general election, is it really important to know how Kansas thinks on Clinton v. Obama?
Clinton and Obama are tied in states that went Kerry - of course to win in 2008, they would need an additional state (Florida, or Virginia perhaps) while holding onto these states that matter. Clinton took the 'non-contested' Florida results while Obama took Virginia.
Note also that these tied delegate numbers do not include numbers for Michigan (a blue state), which Hillary won (no delegates were awarded due to the calendaring issue) and for Pennsylvania, which won't hold the primary till April 22nd.
I am not saying that SC Democrats 'do not matter' - I am saying that Democrats in non-blue and non-purple states cannot help a Democratic nominee win in November with their action at the polls. Given that, their actions at the primary polls should be discounted. Heavily.